home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: hearst.acc.Virginia.EDU!adastra!mbs
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- From: mbs@adastra.cvl.va.us (Michael B. Smith)
- Subject: Re: ADE
- References: <4cahvo$fcg@Mars.mcs.com> <4ceier$eil@globe.indirect.com> <oj6g2dwiz6u.fsf@hpsrk.fc.hp.com>
- X-NewsReader: GRn 3.0b24 December 30, 1995
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- Message-ID: <mbs.46is@adastra.cvl.va.us>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 96 18:06:25 EDT
- Organization: Only if you insist...
-
- In article <oj6g2dwiz6u.fsf@hpsrk.fc.hp.com> koren@hpsrk.fc.hp.com (Steve Koren) writes:
- > fnf@fishpond.amigalib.com (Fred Fish) wrote:
- >
- > > is that a complete multistage rebuild after each significant change takes
- > > over two days on my A4000 with 40Mhz WarpEngine. I'm getting to be in
- >
- > Holy smokes, Fred! What on earth are you compiling, anyway? :-)
- >
- > Depends a whole lot on your source, but on my 040/25, I figure SAS/C is
- > compiling bewteen 100 and 400 C lines per second (much more if you count
- > preprocessed headers). Even at 100 lines/sec, that'd be 17,280,000 source
- > lines in 2 days, never mind that I've got a slower CPU.
- >
- > I guess you must be using gcc? Is it really that much slower?
-
- It doesn't do precompiled headers and isn't residentable (last I checked).
-
- I've provided, several times, copies of rez05.lzh and stripc to
- the list. They make a very significant difference in speed of
- compilation for gcc.
- --
- // Michael B. Smith
- \X/ mbs@adastra.cvl.va.us
-